Posterous theme by Cory Watilo

Systems Approach in Instructional Design to Support Online Learning Effectiveness

P135

Systems Approach in Instructional Design to Support Online Learning Effectiveness

Thursday, November 10, 11:25 a.m.

Information Session – Concurrent Session 7 Learning Effectiveness Pei-Ju Liu (Central Michigan University, US) Additional Author: Mingsheng Dai (Central Michigan University, US)

Description:  Course design is the foundation that teaching and learning builds upon. We share with participants a campus-wide system approach implemented before, during, and after an online course development and revision ‚Äì curricular review, standard structure, 3-level quality reviews, pilot, and follow-up. We also discuss the challenges we face and the future directions.

Notes:

  • CMU - Central Michigan University
    • 210 courses
    • 1,113 sections
    • 19,871 enrollment
    • 22% growth in online over past few years
  • Online courses
    1) Content
    2) Technology
    3) Student
    4) Instructor

Quality Review Process:  course / curriculum approval / expert developer / standard structure / self assessment / instructional designer review / department peer review

  • Curriculum Approvals
    • Current
    • Relevant
    • Collaborative
    • Comprehensive
    • Special Requirements
    • Package / Program Fit
  • Expert Developer
    • Department recommended
    • Subject matter expert
    • Teaching experience
  • Center for ID
    • ID and Production Support
    • Training workshops (development, technical, teaching skills)
  • Standard Structure
    • Establish consistency
    • Ensure easy navigation
    • Provide baseline information
    • Form a consistent mental model when taking different online courses (student perspective)
  • Self-Assessment
    • Self Assessment Developer completes CID Quality Assurance Checklist
    • 45 Questions (course structure, syllabus, content and usability, interaction and learning community, assessment)
  • Department Peer Review
    • An Additional SME Reviews (course and program objectives, content structure, clarity and depth of content, accuracy and schedule of content, additional comments)
  • Master Course Shell
    • Pilot for necessary modifications
    • Cross all sessions
    • Baseline materials
    • Add more
    • Developer teaches it for the first time
  • Revision
    • Activated by:  New book, department request, or > 5 years
    • Similar process
    • Examine the master shell
    • Revision proposal form
    • Three levels of revision
  • Benefits
    • Engaging academic departments (connects outside of unit)
    • Consistency
    • Easy to use
    • Solid foundations for effective teaching and learning
    • Flexibility
  • Challenges
    • Instructors technical skills
    • Concerns about creativity and academic freedom
    • Textbook edition changes
    • Copyright and free/open source management
    • Monitoring course in delivery
    • Online exams