Systems Approach in Instructional Design to Support Online Learning Effectiveness
Systems Approach in Instructional Design to Support Online Learning Effectiveness
Thursday, November 10, 11:25 a.m.
Information Session – Concurrent Session 7 Learning Effectiveness Pei-Ju Liu (Central Michigan University, US) Additional Author: Mingsheng Dai (Central Michigan University, US)
Description: Course design is the foundation that teaching and learning builds upon. We share with participants a campus-wide system approach implemented before, during, and after an online course development and revision – curricular review, standard structure, 3-level quality reviews, pilot, and follow-up. We also discuss the challenges we face and the future directions.
Notes:- CMU - Central Michigan University
- 210 courses
- 1,113 sections
- 19,871 enrollment
- 22% growth in online over past few years
- Online courses
1) Content
2) Technology
3) Student
4) Instructor
Quality Review Process: course / curriculum approval / expert developer / standard structure / self assessment / instructional designer review / department peer review
- Curriculum Approvals
- Current
- Relevant
- Collaborative
- Comprehensive
- Special Requirements
- Package / Program Fit
- Expert Developer
- Department recommended
- Subject matter expert
- Teaching experience
- Center for ID
- ID and Production Support
- Training workshops (development, technical, teaching skills)
- Standard Structure
- Establish consistency
- Ensure easy navigation
- Provide baseline information
- Form a consistent mental model when taking different online courses (student perspective)
- Self-Assessment
- Self Assessment Developer completes CID Quality Assurance Checklist
- 45 Questions (course structure, syllabus, content and usability, interaction and learning community, assessment)
- Department Peer Review
- An Additional SME Reviews (course and program objectives, content structure, clarity and depth of content, accuracy and schedule of content, additional comments)
- Master Course Shell
- Pilot for necessary modifications
- Cross all sessions
- Baseline materials
- Add more
- Developer teaches it for the first time
- Revision
- Activated by: New book, department request, or > 5 years
- Similar process
- Examine the master shell
- Revision proposal form
- Three levels of revision
- Benefits
- Engaging academic departments (connects outside of unit)
- Consistency
- Easy to use
- Solid foundations for effective teaching and learning
- Flexibility
- Challenges
- Instructors technical skills
- Concerns about creativity and academic freedom
- Textbook edition changes
- Copyright and free/open source management
- Monitoring course in delivery
- Online exams
