Posterous theme by Cory Watilo

Filed under: ALN2011

My Explorations of Social Media and Social Media Literacies in Teaching & Learning

Howard RheingoldHoward Rheingold photo courtesy of Oscar Espiritusanto via Flickr used with permission via http://creativecommons.org

My Explorations of Social Media and Social Media Literacies in Teaching & Learning
Friday, November 11,8:50 a.m. – 9:50 a.m.
Howard Rheingold @hrheingold

Description:  Although not an educator by trade, I’ve been interested in the potential of online media for learning since I started exploring what I called “virtual communities” in the 1980s In particular, I was attracted to the ways online media could facilitate collaborative knowledge sharing and exploration In 1995, I designed a demonstration of a “university of the future” for NEC corporation In 2006, I started teaching at UC Berkeley and Stanford I was initially drawn to formal education because I perceived a need to introduce students to the issues of identity, privacy, collective action, public sphere, social capital raised by our increasing use of what are now called social media It only made sense to use blogs, wikis, forums, chat, and social bookmarking when introducing these subjects Contrary to popular beliefs about “digital natives,” I soon learned that social media literacies are not uniformly understood by today’s students At the same time, by paying attention to what students were telling me about our encounters, I was led to forms of pedagogy that have existed at least since the time of John Dewey but which have not been practical until the advent of social media—teaching and learning that is more collaborative and inquiry based and which extends beyond the face to face classroom In addition to the blended learning I’ve facilitated at Stanford and Berkeley, I’ve also started a totally online set of courses: http://www rheingold com/university—and I’m exploring the variety of peer-to-peer courses that are springing up online I’ll talk about how I’ve learned from my students, how we’ve learned to learn together, and how I am now experimenting with purely online teaching and learning I’ll touch upon the social media literacies that are the subject of my current book in progress: attention, participation, collaboration, crap detection, and network awareness.

Notes:

Learning is...

  • Self-Directed
  • Social and Peer to Peer

Working together to solve problems... is not cheating!  It's the best way to learn.

  • Networked Learning
  • Inquiry-based
  • Start with questions and THEN go to the text.
  • Collaborative
  • "Virtual Communities" (1987 issue of whole earth review - first article)
  • 1995 Vision - NEC Curriculum Goals - What would the future be like for learning?  Search and find other students, together you could contact a mentor, and use the media to conduct your own type of learning.  Discussion round tables, graphics and video and sound included.  
  • Howard started teaching at University of California, Berkely about 8 years ago.  Photo of his classroom with most of his students with laptop.  Virtual Communities/Social Media - Sociology 167 
  • Howard was a competition winnder for Digital Media and Learning Competition.  Socialmediaclassroom.com is a drupal installation and you can download and install it and use it. 
  • Socialmediaclassroom.com includes:
    • Wikis are expandable.  The syllabus changes with dialogue with students.  Students are informed of cooperative learning.  Waiting until the night before class, the discussion forums are not a conversation so setting the importance of ongoing and committment to continuous and daily work on the course.  Syllabus is also available in a concept map as well as a Prezi.  See: http://socialmediaclassroom.com/host/vircom 
    • Forums provide group voice.  Conversations in classroom happen online.  Individual contributions build a conversation so that the submission is part of the sum of parts.
    • Blogs are about the individual voice.  Students can read others and comment on them.  This provides reflection.  Reflect on media and the impact.
    • http://hastac.org/ is a site that connects social aspects of learning. "HASTAC ("haystack") is a network of individuals and institutions inspired by the possibilities that new technologies offer us for shaping how we learn, teach, communicate, create, and organize our local and global communities.  We are motivated by the conviction that the digital era provides rich opportunities for informal and formal learning and for collaborative, networked research that extends across traditional disciplines, across the boundaries of academe and community, across the "two cultures" of humanism and technology, across the divide of thinking versus making, and across social strata and national borders."
  • What would you change about the course if you had to take it again?
  • Move the student involvement earlier, along with that came their responsibility to learn. 

Classroom not in rows, but in a circle. There are no back rows in a circle.

  • Collaborative authoring... most students are not used to this.  Students are provided frameworks, perspectives, and vocabulary and their assignment is to fill in definitions on a wiki.  Howard then projects the revision history to illustrate participation and good wiki practice.
  • Mindmaps are used to cover a broad sweep of a bulk of subject matter quickly.  Each "co-teaching team" provides a weekly update to illustrate concepts.  Allows to see subject matter in non-liner and visual display and to look at it in new ways.  To look at content through different lenses.
  • Socialbookmarking - Store and share resources. "Give people the freedom to generate the web."  Diigo and Delicious are examples.
  • Blackboard Collaborate is used for live sessions for Howard's classes.  Whiteboard, chat, screen sharing, video, and group multi-tasking.  Encourage the participants to do a group mindmap using the whiteboard.  It's a dynamic learning session between the face to face sessions.  Voices are heard and students participate.  Bb Collaborate powers the "co-learners" concept.
  • Mini-courses use YouTube videos.   These stand alone and can be accessed after the course. See: http://www.rheingold.com/university/mini-courses/ 

"Peeragogy" - Peers helping each other learn.

  • Students can use technology but they do often need literacy of encoding and decoding and the social aspects of doing things together to learn.  Such as how to use blogs, wikis, and discussion forums for conversation and learning. 
  • Know how to deploy and train your attention. See: http://www.infotention.com/  - Know how to use the technology available to be productive.
  • Infotention: Cognitive - Matching attention to toolsets:
    • Spatial arrangements
    • Visible goals
    • Start small, cultivate habits 
    • What are your attention probes...?
    • Sometimes I ask students to close laptops, close notebooks, close their eyes... and listen to their thoughts and how they are deploying their attention.
    • Which mode of attention is appropriate at the time?
  • Crap detection... Critical Consumption of Searching and Googling
  • Participation is an essential literacy today.  Tagging, blogging, commenting, interaction, bookmarking, discussing, etc.  Vast collective intelligence.
  • Collobaration is an essential skill in the world today.
  • Network awarness and understanding and your position in the network is also important
  • Book: "Net Smart - How to thrive online."

A Three-Tiered Approach to Online Faculty Development: Support When and Where It is Needed Most

P209

A Three-Tiered Approach to Online Faculty Development: Support When and Where It is Needed Most
Thursday, November 10, 3:50 p.m.

Information Session – Concurrent Session 10 Faculty and Professional Development & Support Judith Giering (Drexel University, US) Jennifer Pontano (Drexel University, US)

Description:  This session will present a three-tiered approach to faculty development for online learning and discuss how each tier meets specific technical and pedagogical needs. Results of a faculty survey will be shared during the session, demonstrating the effectiveness of
this approach to training and development.

Notes:

What does an Instructional Designer Do?

  • Work with faculty members directly to develop and deliver several online programs
  • Develop and deliver professional development to promote continued growth in preparing and teaching online courses
  • Communicate with faculty in order to develop schedules and goals
  • Promote high standards of quality course design
  • Work closely with Learning Technologies team to development mulitimedia for online courses
  • Ensure that courses have sound pedagogical design

Tier 1

  • Workshops and Courses
    • Offered online and Face to Face
    • Ability to provide advanced training
    • Encourage sharing of best practices
    • Ability to focus on specific training topics
    • 50% of faculty have attended

Tier 2

  • On Demand Support
    • Resource portals
    • Content examples
    • Testimonials
    • Job Aids
    • Available 24x7
    • Step by step instruction
    • 35% of faculty never accessed

I want to learn how to be more self-reliant to expand my skill set, notwithstanding how great the instructional design staff are... - Faculty member

Tier 3

  • One on One Support
    • Relationship building
    • One point of contact
    • Ability to learn curriculum for better matching
    • 54% used 1 or 2 times per month
    • 44% used 1 or 2 times per semester

Summary

  • All tiers are working and have value.
  • One on one support is particularly used and appreciated by faculty.
  • Range of faculty experience show diverse needs for support.

What could be better?

  • Spend more time on developing workshops that are hitting the target.  What are the topics they really need?
  • Better job publicizing the online resources.
  • Faculty ready for more advanced topics that expand beyond Blackboard.

Faculty Samples Site: http://gcpsx.coeps.drexel.edu/facultysamples/

Technical Resources Site: http://gcpsx.coeps.drexel.edu/tech_resources/

Increasing Online Faculty Virtual Presence in the E-Classroom by Exemplifying the Desired Behavior

P193

Increasing Online Faculty Virtual Presence in the E-Classroom by Exemplifying the Desired Behavior
Thursday, November 10, 2:25 p.m.

Information Session – Concurrent Session 9 Faculty and Professional Development & Support Jose Fierro (Florida State College, US) Sheri Litt (Florida State College, US)

Description: This interactive workshop will teach participants how two administrators motivated and encouraged remote faculty to leave behind the anonymity of the virtual classroom and project their presence into every “corner” of the classroom.

Notes:

  • Increasing the social interactions of the students and the instructors is the goal.
  • Social learning theory and strategy - learn by seeing and socially interact with others.
  • Modeling behaviors are important.
  • Increase Faculty Presence = Increase Student Performance

Motivate, Connect, Exemplify Behavior - Recognize and Reward Excellence!

  • Virtual Convocation Wiki - Provide awareness, synchronous and asynchronous discussions, formal and informal exchange.  80% of faculty posted photos.
  • Newsletter - Faculty bulletin provides information 3 times a year.  Highlight what faculty are doing.  Brings about awareness of possibilities.
  • Faculty Handbook - Placed online so it is interactive.  There is searching, links to websites, videos, etc.
  • Video Messages - These are used to increase social presence and these are good ways to convey information in a new way.  Clever backgrounds were used which created interest.  Faculty start asking... how do I do that with our students?  Here is a sample
    • Secondlife video was also used.  Rawlslyn Francis - Adjunct English Professor has posted a video to engage students using this technology. 
    • Camtasia Studio is also used for faculty to edit and create video.

Here is a screen shot from YouTube of English Professor, Rawlslyn Francis in SecondLife:

Sl

Congratulations to the Sloan-C Award Winners

(download)

Photos from award luncheon above.

Sloan-C Awards for Excellence in Online Teaching and Learning
Thursday, November 10 12:00p.m. – 1:30p.m.


Description: The Sloan Consortium annual awards recognize excellence and effectiveness. Online learning has greatly progressed since 1992 when the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation began giving grants to institutions for online learning initiatives. Recipients of the 2011 Sloan-C Awards for Excellence in Online Teaching and Learning have demonstrated exceptional leadership and real success in advancing online education. This year’s award recipients epitomize Sloan-C’s watchwords of quality, scale and breadth.

2011 Ralph E. Gomory Award for Quality Online Education
- University of Massachusetts Lowell

2011 A. Frank Mayadas Leadership Award
- Joel L. Hartman
- University of Central Florida

2011 Sloan-C Awards for Excellence in Online Teaching and Learning

Outstanding Achievement in Online Education by an Individual
- Wayne D. Smutz
- Pennsylvania State University World Campus

Excellence in Online Teaching
- Ellen B. Bremen
- Highline Community College

Michael R. Cheney
- University of Illinois Springfield

Excellence in Faculty Development for Online Teaching
- SUNY Empire State College

Outstanding Online Program
- Cyber Security Program Polytechnic Institute of New York University

Excellence in Institution-Wide Online Education
- Ryerson University Pennsylvania State University World Campus

Millennials, Social Media, and Education: Connecting with Your Students Using Twitter and Facebook

P155

Millennials, Social Media, and Education: Connecting with Your Students Using Twitter and Facebook
Thursday, November 10, 1:40 p.m.
Information Session – Concurrent Session 8 Technology and Emerging Learning Environments Joshua Murdock (Valencia College, US) - http://professorjosh.wordpress.com/ and http://twitter.com/professorjosh

Description:  While companies scramble to grab the attention of young minds through social media, educators are left scratching their heads. We will share what we learned about working with millennial students, the generation gap, and the secret to winning the attention of students on their turf.

Who are Millennials?
What are they?
How do we engage them?

1977 to 1982 Born - Millennials

  • social
  • multitaskers

Individuals raised with computers deal with information differently compared to previous cohorts: they develop hypertext minds, they leap around... - Marc Prensky

Characteristics

  • Accustomed to keyboards
  • Interact with peers differently
  • Experiential learning and hands on
  • Attention deployment - shift attention / hypertext
  • Multitasking is a way of life
  • Staying connected is essential
  • The "Google It"

Learning Styles

  • Growing up with technology
  • Mobile devices are the norm
  • Way of learning and connecting and accessing information
  • A Magazine is an iPad Commercial - YouTube

Statistics

  • 75% are using Social Networks
  • 65% television, 59% internet, 24% newspaper, 18% radio
  • 50% say they get news from mobile device

How they "tick"?

  • Exposed to vast information
  • Different patterns of communication and social intimacy
  • Ambitious but with unrealistic expectations
  • Well aware of rules but like to challenge circumventing

Goal

  • Not to discard social media, but to figure out how to make it a powerful tool.

The qualities that make Twitter seem insane and half-backed are what makes it so powerful. - Jonathan Zittrain

Twitter - Variety of Content, News Source, Instant Information, Promotional Tool, Networking

  • 140 characters is a tweet
  • DM - direct message
  • Hashtag -Community tagging
  • Dweet - A tweet sent while drunk

Twitter helps you inspire others. - Amanda Kern @amandakern

#SMEDU Chat on Twitter - Every Wed 12PM and 9PM EST

Academic Excellence in 140 Characters - twitter.com/reyjunco

  • Students showed the positive effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades.  See YouTube video here.

Purdue - Hotseat

  • Twitter like IN the classroom.

Facebook

  • Connect, collaborate, share, network
  • "Like" pages

Not being on Facebook is like not having a TV or not owning a cellphone, you can avoid it but you'll really miss out. - Lisa Macon

  • Facebook Groups in Education - The Advantage of Facebook Group in Education by Nate Green
  • Promote collaboration
  • Educational links and share them

Instead of asking students to stop using it, embrace Facebook as a learning and communication tool. - Amanda Kern

 

 

Systems Approach in Instructional Design to Support Online Learning Effectiveness

P135

Systems Approach in Instructional Design to Support Online Learning Effectiveness

Thursday, November 10, 11:25 a.m.

Information Session – Concurrent Session 7 Learning Effectiveness Pei-Ju Liu (Central Michigan University, US) Additional Author: Mingsheng Dai (Central Michigan University, US)

Description:  Course design is the foundation that teaching and learning builds upon. We share with participants a campus-wide system approach implemented before, during, and after an online course development and revision ‚Äì curricular review, standard structure, 3-level quality reviews, pilot, and follow-up. We also discuss the challenges we face and the future directions.

Notes:

  • CMU - Central Michigan University
    • 210 courses
    • 1,113 sections
    • 19,871 enrollment
    • 22% growth in online over past few years
  • Online courses
    1) Content
    2) Technology
    3) Student
    4) Instructor

Quality Review Process:  course / curriculum approval / expert developer / standard structure / self assessment / instructional designer review / department peer review

  • Curriculum Approvals
    • Current
    • Relevant
    • Collaborative
    • Comprehensive
    • Special Requirements
    • Package / Program Fit
  • Expert Developer
    • Department recommended
    • Subject matter expert
    • Teaching experience
  • Center for ID
    • ID and Production Support
    • Training workshops (development, technical, teaching skills)
  • Standard Structure
    • Establish consistency
    • Ensure easy navigation
    • Provide baseline information
    • Form a consistent mental model when taking different online courses (student perspective)
  • Self-Assessment
    • Self Assessment Developer completes CID Quality Assurance Checklist
    • 45 Questions (course structure, syllabus, content and usability, interaction and learning community, assessment)
  • Department Peer Review
    • An Additional SME Reviews (course and program objectives, content structure, clarity and depth of content, accuracy and schedule of content, additional comments)
  • Master Course Shell
    • Pilot for necessary modifications
    • Cross all sessions
    • Baseline materials
    • Add more
    • Developer teaches it for the first time
  • Revision
    • Activated by:  New book, department request, or > 5 years
    • Similar process
    • Examine the master shell
    • Revision proposal form
    • Three levels of revision
  • Benefits
    • Engaging academic departments (connects outside of unit)
    • Consistency
    • Easy to use
    • Solid foundations for effective teaching and learning
    • Flexibility
  • Challenges
    • Instructors technical skills
    • Concerns about creativity and academic freedom
    • Textbook edition changes
    • Copyright and free/open source management
    • Monitoring course in delivery
    • Online exams

A Multi-Faceted Approach to Establishing and Maintaining Online Course Quality

P130

A Multi-Faceted Approach to Establishing and Maintaining Online Course Quality
Thursday, November 10, 10:40 a.m.
Information Session – Concurrent Session 6 Faculty and Professional Development & Support Peter Testori (Bay Path College, US) Amber Vaill (Bay Path College, US)

Description:  Ensuring quality in online education is important to all stakeholders at any educational institution. This presentation will explore Bay Path College’s multi- faceted approach to establishing and maintaining online course quality; allowing faculty to retain academic freedom and ensuring consistency for students.

Notes:

  • What is quality?
    • Accreditation
    • Interaction
    • Consistancy
    • Assessment
    • ...

What are and how different are views of quality with: Institution vs Faculty vs Student?

  • Rapid growth and scalability create challenges for course quality and stakeholders' expectations.
  • Starting off on the right foot - Orientation Course for Faculty:
    • 8 weeks long
    • Mandatory
    • Facilitated orientation
    • Overview of online learning policies
    • Provides experience of an online student
    • Shared learning experience for instructors
    • Pedagogy of online education
    • Needs of online students
    • Student-centered approaches
    • Create and manage content in LMS
    • Assesments for online
    • Communication and effective community building strategies
    • Challenges of online teaching
  • Course Development
    • Supportive processes
    • Consistent course design (instructional designer assistance)
    • Proper utilization of LMS tools
    • Encourage use of backward design (learning outcomes to assessments to course content)
  • Review Process
    • Consistency is reviewed so their is a common experience for students.
    • Use of checklists and templates (extremely helpful)
    • Collaboration with ID (relationship based)
    • 2 phased review process includes collaboration with academic affairs
    • Intellectual freedom is still celebrated
  • Course Delivery
    • Ongoing technical and pedagogical support
    • Instructional designer assistance
    • Online student support coordinator (first line of defense for students and their support - allows faculty to focus on course, students, learning, content)
  • Reflection on process
    • Successes include: consistent experience, student satisfaction, satisfied and engaged faculty
    • Challenges include: reluctant faculty, post-course evaluation (faculty assess experiences of course for changes for next semester), adapting quality measures to a new LMS, scalability (growth can impact quality attention)

Instructional designer involvement begins at course development and continues through delivery to provide a continuous support framework and quality attention.

The Obviousness of Open Policy

P125

The Obviousness of Open Policy
Thursday, November 10, 8:50 a.m. – 9:50 a.m.

Cable Green (Creative Commons, US) @cgreen

Description:  The Internet, increasingly affordable computing, open licensing, open access journals and open educational resources provide the foundation for a world in which a quality education can be a basic human right Yet before we break the “iron triangle” of access, cost and quality with new models, we need to educate policy makers about the obviousness of open policy: public access to publicly funded resources

Notes:

  • Cable "O" Green - O is for Open!  :-)
  • Slides available at: slideshare.net/cgreen
  • What if we had a food machine and we could feed everyone?  Would we turn it on?  Yes!  Now we have a learning machine at our institutions and we need to turn it on.
  • Education Dream - Everyone in the world can attain the education they desire, but we need to share resources to do so.  We need to do so quickly to meet the global education needs.
  • In 2006 at the heart of the moment "Hewlett Foundation"
  • Organizations involved in OER (Open Education Resources) Movement: Hewlett Foundcation, Open Society Foundation, Shuttleworth Foundation, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Next Generation Learning Challenges, Unesco, OECD, Creative Commons

David Wiley - If we are not sharing we are not teaching...

  • Reuse / Revise / Remix / Redistribute
  • Free as in free beer but free as in freedom is critical to the academy as we take resources and make them better
  • Saylor.org - Open textbook challenge and free education
  • Open Courseware Consortium

OER Definition: Teaching, learning, and research materials in any media that reside in the public domain or have been released under an open license that permits their free use and repurposing by others.

  • Budget cuts have had a negative impact on OER.
  • Open community is large and is passionate. 
  • Everyone can access and gain knowledge.
  • The problem: Policy
    • Most of policy makers do not understand tech and legal tools that can connect and turn on the education machine to make the open education dream possible.  It is our job to help them understand.
    • Tools:  We have the internet, storage is essentially free, and bandwidth is up, new mass willingness to share.  There is a new empowerment to share.
  • What can we do about the cost of commercial out-of-date textbooks?  Cost of copy: 250 page book - copy by hand $1,000 - copy by print on demand $4.90 - copy by internet $.00084 --- this is affordable! :-)
  • Copy and distribute are free... it's a new conversation.
  • Rivalrous vs Non-rivalrous Resources - Digital resources can be non-riveralrous if they are licensed correctly.
  • Creative Commons
    • Step 1: Choose a Condition - Attribution, Share Alike, Non-Commercial, No Derivative Works
    • Step 2: Receive a License - Provides access to others based on your condition.
    • 500 million items on the web currently in CC
    • Flickr and Wikipedia use it and the Whitehouse too!
    • MIT 900 Courses and OpenCourseware Resources
    • You don't have to ask for permission with these resources because their is access granted and things can happen to advance and leverage the information.  Translation and affordability and customization are provided through the Creative Commons Licensing.  Portability is a big deal.  Search and discovery is a big deal. 
    • If we have common needs... we all teach the same top 100 courses EN101 etc. we can and should share resources.
  • Publicly funded resources should be openly licensed resources.  If tax payer money is used the knowledge should be public.

Is public money being used to pay for textbooks at $20 billion per year?

  • Most countries spend 5 to 6% of their GDP on education.  $3 trillion is spent on education.  How much is spent on courseware or subsidizing or directly paying for textbooks?
  • Because we pay for it = we should have access.  Public access to resources to publicly funded operations.
  • Open is the default and closed the exception rather than the other way around.
  • We should partner with legislators to:
    • efficiently use of national state dollars,
    • saving students money,
    • increasing access
  • Cooperate and Share and we all win... faculty will have new choices, more eyes on the problem, affordability, self-interest, and social justice.
  • Textbook RFP?  Let's think in new ways...  textbooks are a perpetual lease and we pay over and over - and much of this is coming from financial public aid - the average cost of a textbook is $176. This is insane behavior... we need to have an RFP for textbooks.
    • Textbooks for the Top 100 Highest Enrollment Courses
    • Textbooks for the K12 Common Core
  • Peer to Peer Universities, OpenBadges, Straighterline, Western Governers University, OER University are new emerging OER models.  These anchor institutions provide credit.
  • As you build your courses, when open education resources exist BEFORE buying off the shelf!
  • Massive change... gatekeeping is the previous norm.
  • Publishers would like nothing more than to continue leasing resources so that you no longer have rights to a tangible good.  Gatekeep and lock up information is the existing business model.
  • Strategy - We require public goods go into the public domain.  You don't play by the existing rules, you play by the new rules.  Digital affordances - we build what we consume - we can change how we do things.
  • Washington State - We will have textbooks under $30... publishers you can join us if you want...
  • We have to think bigger and make smarter decisions collectively.
  • Only ONE thing matters:
  • Efficient use of public funds to increase student success and access to quality educational materials.  Everything else (including all existing business models) is secondary.

The opposite of open isn't "closed"  - the opposite of open is "broken"

 

Congratulations to the Sloan-C Fellows Award Winners!

(download)

Patsy D. Moskal
University of Central Florida
“In recognition of her groundbreaking work in the assessment of the impact and efficacy of online and blended learning.”

Mary P. Niemiec
University of Illinois at Chicago
“For remarkable vision and national leadership in conceptualizing and advancing blended learning.”

Lawrence C. Ragan
Penn State World Campus
“For national leadership in preparing faculty for online teaching success and for creating innovative approaches to the design of online learning environments.”

Peter J. Shea
University at Albany
“For outstanding research that has advanced our understanding of online learning and for noteworthy contributions to the field of online education.”

Robert N. Ubell
Polytechnic Institute of New York University
“For exceptional leadership in scientific and technical online learning programming, international collaboration, and enterprise learning.”

More information about the Sloan-C Fellows Program.

Keynote - The New Education Ecology

P107

The New Education Ecology
Lee Rainie (Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project, US)

Description: Lee Rainie, Director of the Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project, will discuss the Project’s most recent findings about Americans use the internet and their mobile devices to learn, share, and create information He will discuss how the changed media environment is affecting learners’ expectations about the availability of information and the ways in which learning takes place In this new environment, the traditional boundaries between home and school, teacher and pupil, public and private are breaking down and that is affecting the way learning occurs Lee will describe how Pew Internet has looked at these subjects and the ways in which schools and families are responding to them

Notes:

  • Broadband facilitates network information
    • Volume and variety of information is growing at 20-30% a year
    • Pervasive media
    • Links and multimedia provide extension of data
    • Self-paced learning
    • Analytics - the age of "big data" / data by humans but by machines and other artifacts / what is our effectiveness - becoming more important
  • Social media aids peer-to-peer learning by doing
    • Social networking 50% of adults are using
      • 83% of 18-29 year olds
      • 70% from 30-49 year olds
      • 51% 50-64 year olds
      • 33% 65+ year olds
    • 83% are millenials
    • Mean size of Facebook Friends - millenials have 318.5 friends
    • Changes character of soc.nets / more people are in social networks than there used to be - this includes small groups, churches, or other unique segments
    • Increases the role of social networks in learning - 1) signal systems / alerts and early warning - what is happening, 2) information evaluators - making sense of information and connect with others in their network, is this true?, how much weight should I give it? 3) audiences - provides a way to show and share 4) Do-it-yourself learning (the rise of the amateur experts).

82% of teens take their phone to bed with them...

  • Mobile connectivity alters learning venues and expectations
    • 302.9 million mobile subscriber connections in America in 2010 and now 327.6 million (315.5 million is the total population in America).  So... there are more phones than people.
    • 35% of adults own smartphones
    • 94% of millennials have a cell phone
    • 71% of millennials have a laptop (only 52% have a desktop)
    • Mobile internet connectors - 63% of adults have access to the net (2/3's of Americans connect)  In 2008 it was 37%.
    • New access points rise (anytime/anywhere)
    • Attention zones morph (while watching TV have their mobile device with them) 
    • Real-time sharing and just-in-time searching - we need to be expert searchers
    • Augmented reality - packing more data into the physical world
    • Pervasive and perpetual awareness of social networks (conversations never end)

 We live our lives in continuous partial attention...

  • New kinds of learners emerge
    • More self-directed than they used to be (not necessarily preferred but they are confident that they can)
    • Better arrayed to capture new information
    • More reliant on feedback and response
    • More inclined to collaboration - they expect to work in groups
    • Nodes of production, more oriented towards
  • Digital Revolution
    • 95% teens use internet
    • 78% adults use internet
    • 82% teens have broadband
    • 62% adults have broadband
    • 74% are millennials (18-34) / 71% Gen X (35-46) / 60% Younger Boomers...
  • Networked creator among internet users
    • 65% are social networking site users
    • 55% share photos
    • 37% contribute rankings and ratings
    • 33% create content tags
    • 30% share personal creations
    • 26% post comments
    • 15% have a personal website
    • 15% are content remixers
    • 14% are bloggers
    • 13% use Twitter
    • 6% are using location services with 9% allowing location awareness, and 23% mapping services
  • Good news for online learning
    • Presidents predict the future of online learning.  More than half of their students in 10 years will be taking an online course.  At 2 year private/public now 16% and in 10 years 65% expected.
  • Quality of online learning - not so good news
    • Presidents say: 39% said it is equal, and 57% said no
    • At 2 year private/public instiuttions 66% yes, and 34% no
  • Changed socio-economic context
    • Back in history primary apprentice philosophy - a fixed platform
    • Horace mann version of education - universal access, industrial era
    • Lifelong learning - never stop learning, learning extends and goes beyond formal schooling - world moves faster and we have new environment we need to constantly add to our stores of knowledge
    • Learning as Transaction - OLD (Shana Ratner, 1997)
    • Learning as a Process - NEW
    • Learners receive knowledge - OLD
    • Learners create knowledge - NEW
    • Knowledge is hierarchical (individual) - OLD
    • Knowledge is ecological (new taxonomies and communities) - NEW
  • The future of universities
    • In 2020 higher education will not be much different from the way it is today. (Agree or Disagree)
    • Or in 2020 higher education will be quite different from the way it is today. (Agree or Disagree)
      • Themes:
        • Push back on the timeline
        • Tiering of responses, some universities will not change other will change drastically.
        • A critical variable was administration.  They would either push hard or hold back.
        • We have an uncharted map - we haven't yet seen the innovations that are going to blow us all away - we are at the infancy of grand cleverness and innovation. 

Online education is building on the frontiers.